Back to insights

By Jamie Brennan · · Updated 28 June 2026

AI is moving into the tools your team already uses. Here is what that means for your business

Anthropic just put Claude inside Slack as a shared team assistant. The interesting part for a small business is not the chatbot, it is where AI is finally showing up: inside the work you already do.

A team gathered around a laptop reviewing work together in an office.

For the last couple of years, “using AI at work” has mostly meant opening a separate window, pasting something in, copying the answer back out, and getting on with your day. Useful, but clunky. It sat beside the work instead of inside it.

That is starting to change, and a launch this week is a good marker of where things are heading.

What actually happened

Anthropic released Claude Tag, which puts its Claude AI assistant directly inside Slack, the messaging tool a lot of teams already run their day on. Instead of a private chatbot each person uses on their own, it works as a shared assistant in your channels. Anyone on the team can tag it into a conversation, hand it a task, and see what it is working on. The next person can pick up where the last one left off.

A few details are worth pulling out, because they signal the direction more than the product itself:

  • It remembers context from the conversations and data sources it has been given access to, so you are not re-explaining the situation every time.
  • An admin controls what it can touch: which channels, which tools, which information. It is not loose in everything.
  • It can work in the background, scheduling and chipping away at a task over hours or days rather than answering one question and forgetting it.

Right now it is in beta on Anthropic’s Team and Enterprise plans, so it is not aimed at the corner cafe just yet. But the pattern it represents is the part to pay attention to.

Why this matters for a small business

The headline is not “there is a new chatbot.” It is that AI is moving out of a side window and into the tools your team already works in: your inbox, your messaging app, your booking system, your accounting software.

That shift matters because the clunky copy-paste version was never going to stick. People are busy. If using AI costs you three context switches, you will not bother on a Tuesday afternoon when the phone is ringing. The value shows up when the help is sitting inside the thing you are already doing, quietly handling the follow-ups, lookups and reminders that usually slip through the cracks.

For a small Melbourne team, that is the whole game. You do not have a spare person to chase every unanswered enquiry, re-send every quote, or tidy every booking. That is exactly the kind of low-glamour, repetitive work this style of AI is good at, and it is work that, left undone, quietly costs you jobs.

The trap to avoid

Here is the honest part. A shared AI assistant in your tools is only as good as the process you point it at. Switch it on with no clear job and you get a smarter way to do nothing in particular, which is how a lot of businesses end up paying for AI and feeling no different.

We see the same thing in the wider numbers: plenty of businesses have now turned something on, but far fewer can tell you what it actually returned. We dug into that gap recently, where teams adopt new tools without changing how the work actually runs. Adoption is easy. Getting a result is the bit that takes a little thought.

The businesses that get value do something unglamorous first. They pick one annoying, repeatable process: the enquiries that do not get a reply fast enough, the quotes that take two days to go out, the reconciliation nobody enjoys. Then they decide what “better” looks like before flipping anything on. Hours saved. Faster quotes. More booked jobs. Something you can actually point at in a month.

And they keep a human in the loop where it counts. The best examples of this, even from the big accounting platforms now wiring AI into BAS and reconciliation, still have a person sign off before anything goes out the door. That is the right instinct, not a limitation.

Where to start

You do not need a Team plan or a Slack workspace to act on this. The useful question is simpler, and you can ask it today: where in our week does the same manual task eat the most time, and where does dropping it quietly cost us work?

Answer that honestly and you have found your first, highest-return place to put AI to work inside the tools you already have. Not a science project. One process, measured, with a person still in charge.

That is the work we do with Melbourne businesses every week: looking at how your site, your enquiries and your day-to-day tools actually fit together, then wiring in the automation that saves real hours, not the version that just adds another login.

If you would like a plain read on where that would pay off for your business, book a free digital systems audit. No jargon, no hard sell, just an honest look at where the time is going and what is worth automating first.

Let's talk

Want to see where your digital systems are holding you back?